Skip to content
← Event notes

Why a confident AI answer may not be correct

I attended as a participant

The Workshop on Uncertainty in Machine Learning in Tartu.

These are my notes as an attendee at the ‘Workshop on Uncertainty in Machine Learning (WUML2026), Tartu’, held from 2 to 4 February 2026.

A three-day international workshop in Tartu focusing on uncertainty in AI systems and machine learning.

What I took away

Hallucinations and uncertainty are not simply random noise. They can be better understood, measured and accounted for through checks in a workflow.

How I use this in my work

I use these insights in training when explaining when to trust AI output, when to check it and why confidence does not always mean correctness.

Event information: Workshop on Uncertainty in Machine Learning (WUML2026), Tartu.

The ChatGPT and Gemini image-generator comparison provides another example of why output needs checking. Editing an initially convincing image revealed artefacts that can be easy to miss in a small preview.

Original event source ↗